Trust

Limits and risks

Not audited. The contracts have been tested on a fork of the real chain, with real rounds. They have not been reviewed by an independent auditor. Do not put serious money behind a draw yet.

Technical limits

Public at once. When a round is signed everyone sees it. It is useless for secrets; it is for fairness.
One network. Only drand quicknet is supported. A different network means a different key and a different contract constant.
Equal tickets only. Weights are written as repeated entries. A true weighted draw is not implemented.
Winner count. Selection cost grows with the square of winners. Tested up to 20.
Time comes from block.timestamp. A sequencer can nudge it by a little. The minimum lead of 2 rounds absorbs that.
Not deployed. There are no addresses to point to yet.

Human limits

A draw is only as fair as its rules: who can enter, until when, how the list is published. Cricket makes the choice unbiased, not the surrounding process.
Raffles can count as gambling in some places. That is your responsibility, not the contract's.
If the network key or the relays change, old proofs stay valid for their own round, but the contract constants would need an update.

The coin

$CRICKET funds the build and is not used by the contracts. Nothing on this site is financial advice.